Redundant types in composite literals
Reports redundant type declarations in composite literals.
Example:
nums := [][]int{[]int{1}, []int{2}}
We have a slice of slices of the int type. In this case, you can use a shorter definition. You can fix this code manually or use the Delete redundant type quick-fix. After the quick-fix is applied, the code looks as follows:
nums := [][]int{{1},{2}}
For more information about composite literals, refer to Go Language Specification: Composite Literals at go.dev.
Locating this inspection
- By ID
Can be used to locate inspection in e.g. Qodana configuration files, where you can quickly enable or disable it, or adjust its settings.
GoRedundantTypeDeclInCompositeLit- Via Settings dialog
Path to the inspection settings via IntelliJ Platform IDE Settings dialog, when you need to adjust inspection settings directly from your IDE.
Inspection ID: GoRedundantTypeDeclInCompositeLit
Suppressing Inspection
You can suppress this inspection by placing the following comment marker before the code fragment where you no longer want messages from this inspection to appear:
More detailed instructions as well as other ways and options that you have can be found in the product documentation:
Inspection Details | |
|---|---|
By default bundled with: | |
Can be installed with plugin: | Go, 252.26654.0 |